Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 15 Next »

Introduction


MiniDV is a digital video cassette format that utilizes the DV encoding standard. The first MiniDV camcorder was released in 1996 and was used in consumer, industrial, and educational sectors. MiniDV has the same tape width (1/4") and compression as standard DVC, however the tape is housed in a smaller cassette. MiniDV was more popular among consumers at the time and became the most widely used DV cassette format. Some MiniDV cassettes incorporated memory in cassette (MIC) technology to store additional data such as camera settings, dates and times of recordings and a list of contents. 

Physical Characteristics


Tape width¼ inch (6.35mm)
Tape compositionMetal evaporate (ME)
Cassette dimensions

2 9/16" x 1 7/8" x 7/16"

Container dimensions

2 7/8" x 2" x 5/8"

Identifying features

Sony MiniDV cassettes are usually labeled in the lower left hand corner

Panasonic MiniDV cassettes are usually labeled with a sticker on the right side

Common manufacturers/brandsSony, Panasonic, JVC
Playback
  • MiniDV tapes can playback in MiniDV VTRs and most DVCAM VTRs
  • DVCAM recordings cannot playback in a MiniDV camera or VTR

Technical Characteristics


Record time

Standard play: 60 - 80 minutes

Long play: 90 - 120 minutes 

Record/playback speedStandard play mode: 18.81 mm/sec
Track pitchStandard play: 10 microns
Long play: 6.7 microns
Track width Standard play: 10 microns
Long play: 6.7 microns
Bitrate25 Mbit/s
Bit depth8 bit
Colour sampling

PAL: 4:2:0

NTSC: 4:1:1

Resolution

PAL: 720x576
NTSC: 720x480

Compression5:1 DVC-format DCT compression (intra-frame)


Storage


Storage environment: temperature

Ideal: 40–54°F (4.5–12°C)

Acceptable: 55–60°F (13–15.5°C)

Storage environment: humidity30–50% RH
Container

MiniDV containers should pass the Photographic Activity Test (PAT) as specified ISO Standard 18916:2007

  • Plastic: Polyethylene, polypropylene, or polyester (a.k.a. Mylar D or Melinex 516). No PVC or acetate
  • Paper/Paperboard: If paper containers are necessary, they should be constructed from lignin-free, neutral pH paper/paperboard

Containers are acceptable if they:

  • Are clean and free of mould
  • Protect the media from dust and other contaminants
  • Are not introducing contaminants through degradation

Unacceptable containers must be replaced with clean, inert containers.

Orientation of tape in storageVertical on its end (like books)

Types of damage and deterioration


Binder deterioration

Description

Commonly known as "sticky shed syndrome." Affected records will have a visible gummy or powdery residue on the surface of the tape. This can damage both the recorded material and playback equipment. Back-coated tapes are most affected by this type of deterioration. 

Cause

Polyester urethane is prone to moisture absorption which can cause the molecular structure of the binder to break down. This process is accelerated by high temperature and high humidity.

Remedy

Environmental conditioning: Moving the tape to a controlled storage environment (40°C / 20 to 25% Relative Humidity) may reverse the affects of hydrolysis over time.

Baking: Holding the tape at an elevated temperature (45°C to 55°C) for a brief period of time (up to 36 hours) can temporarily remove moisture and allow normal playback for a period of one to two weeks. Tapes should not be rewound before baking. 

Drop-out

https://www.musiikkiarkisto.fi/audio/audio113.html

Description

A brief signal loss caused by a tape head clog, missing magnetic oxide particles, tape defect, or debris on the tape or machine. These factors can reduce head-to-tape spacing and result in the appearance of white spots or streaks on playback. Multiple drop-outs per frame will result in a snowy appearance. 

Cause

Tapes kept in dusty conditions will accumulate particulate matter, increasing the risk of drop-out. 

Remedy

Flaking/missing magnetic oxide particles are an indication of tape deterioration. This type of drop-out cannot be corrected physically. 

Mould

Description

Active mould is generally moist while dormant mould is dry and dusty. Mould growths may be white, black, brown or mustard-coloured and usually have a pattered, fuzzy, or thread-like appearance. Mould can cause permanent damage to tapes over time if not removed. Fungus and mould is also a significant health hazard and affected materials should be handled using gloves and masks. 

Cause

Storing tapes at high temperature and relative humidity levels can facilitate the growth of mould. 

Remedy

Mouldy tapes should be isolated from unaffected materials to prevent cross contamination. Store tapes at a temperature of 24°C in an environment with effective air circulation and less than 50% Relative Humidity. Loose mold can be vacuumed from the tape pack and then the tape should be treated with an appropriate fungicide.  

Stretching and breaking

Cause

Stretching and breaking of video tape usually results from improper handling or use of playback equipment.  

Remedy

Stretching can distort the tape signal however data can usually be recovered (with a decrease in signal quality). 

Accidental recording

Description

Camera operators can accidentally record over pre-existing footage

Cause 

Tape is set to "record mode" when it is inserted into camera or deck

Remedy

Ensure tape is set to "safe mode" before inserting into camera or deck.

Risk assessment


HIGH RISK

  1. Digital video material stored on magnetic videotape is considered to be at high-risk of loss or degradation.

    1. Polyester base film used in videotape is considered very stable.

    2. Other components of the videotape, including the binder, are considerably less stable and are more likely to be the cause of degradation.

    3. Format obsolesce, including lack of well-functioning playback equipment poses an equal or even greater risk than degradation, even with higher quality formats such as Digital Betacam

  2. Archivists should appraise or reappraise digital video material stored on magnetic tape to determine the nature and significance of video elements contained on the tape. See Section 5 of the University Archives Procedure Manual for guidance on appraising sound recordings and moving images.

  3. The archival appraisal should determine whether the video elements have sufficient archival value to justify reformatting and long-term preservation as digital video files.

Related resources


Digitization Handbook:

University Archives Procedure Manual

Technology Watch

Further Reading


Visit the /wiki/spaces/ALC/overview for further reading on /wiki/spaces/ALC/pages/1891631115

Sources


AMIA. "Video Preservation Factsheets." Accessed December 10, 2020. 

Bensinger, Charles. "Chapter 6: All about videotape." In The Video Guide, Second Edition, 71-75. Santa Barbara, California: Video-Info Publications, 1981. 

Bogart, John Van. "What Can Go Wrong With Magnetic Media?" In Magnetic Tape Storage and Handling: A Guide for Libraries and Archives. Washington, DC: The Commission on Preservation and Access, 1995. 

Casey, Mike. "FACET: Format characteristics and preservation problems." Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, 2007. 

Gibson, Gerald. D. "Magnetic tape deterioration: recognition, recovery and prevention." Paper presented at the IASA Conference, Perugia, August 26, 1996.

Jimenez, Mona and Liss Platt. "Videotape Identification and Assessment Guide." Texas Commission on the Arts. 2004. 

MediaCollege.com. "The MiniDV Format." Accessed February 3, 2021. 

Museum of Obsolete Media. "MiniDV (1995 – late 2000s)." Accessed February 3, 2021.

Nielsen, Rebecca. "Media Recognition: DV Part 1." Bodleian Libraries. March 26, 2012. 

Preservation Self Assessment Program. "Videotape: MiniDV." University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Accessed February 3, 2021. 

WDVA. "Do DV Formats Mystify You?" 2004. 

Wheeler, Jim. "Videotape preservation handbook." 2002. 

Wilt, Adam J. "The DV, DVCAM & DVCPRO Formats: The DV formats tabulated." August 28, 2005. 

Version history


VersionDateAuthor(s)Version Notes




  • No labels